Close

Get in Touch

Contact us to learn more about our elite cybersecurity services and industry-leading technologies.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Close
Breachquest

Emergency Incident Assistance

Is your network under attack? Get in touch with a
BreachQuest Specialist right away with this form.

You can also reach us by calling our 24/7 hotline.

+1 888 409 5811

Or start a chat with a specialist now.

Live Chat

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

You can also reach us by calling our 24/7 hotline.

+1 888 409 5811

Or start a chat with a specialist now.

Live Chat

Lloyds not paying cyber claims, had us asking questions.

12.07.21
By: BreachQuest

LLoyds of London cyber insurance

Last week, Lloyds of London released a bulletin saying they would no longer pay for ‘acts of cyber-war or nation-state retaliation attacks’. Immediately there was a “firestorm of concern” from tech experts. So, we took it to our resident insurance market expert and Chief Revenue Officer, Shawn Melito, to get his take. This is what he had to say:

Clarification of Cyber Insurance Policies

The general consensus around the new Lloyd’s language covering state-sponsored attacks is that this isn’t a death knell for cyber insurance.  Most cyber policies already had a war exclusion. This attempts to standardize the definition and give the insurers more leeway in calling out state-sponsored attacks to reduce confusion and arguments when a claim arises – another move towards clarification as cyber insurance policies mature.

Over the last few years, ransomware and the number of claims have been increasing (see our blog post on the Corvus report for Q3 2021). The escalation has meant that many claims books have been well into the red. Insurers have been forced to look at their exposures.  One major insurer recently announced a move towards a reduced coverage model for what they define as catastrophic events, and others will undoubtedly follow suit. Insurers cannot continue as-is, paying out claims at their rates for the premiums they charge – it just isn’t a sustainable model.

That all said, for those purchasing cyber insurance, there are two critical points to remember.

  • The changes are only suggested language, Lloyd’s-based insurers can use them as they see fit.
  • Lloyd’s isn’t the only place to purchase cyber insurance.  Potential clients can work with their brokers to find more broadly worded policies elsewhere.

Those insurers willing to take on a broader definition of what constitutes a claim they will pay can potentially have a more significant market share.

 

Shawn Melito serves as Chief Revenue Officer for BreachQuest.  He is responsible for marketing and business development activities in the cyber insurance community, including breach coaches, claims managers, and brokers.  Previously Shawn was a Managing Director for Kivu Consulting, and Management Consultant, Information Systems Analyst, and business unit leader for NPC’s Immersion Data Breach Response Service group, a leading notification and call center service provider to the cyber insurance community.  He has also managed a Canadian breach response and identity theft services company, as well as Healthcare, Insurance Services, and a contract with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
Share this article:

Sign up for our newsletter to get more industry news and insights.

Related Insights

11.19.21

Cyber-Insurance – What you need to know.

Read more

11.05.21

Decline in Cyber Insurance Claims: Good News, or Just a Sign of the Times?

Read more